in Re Eldridge McKnight, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 2013·No. 01-13-00485-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 27, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00485-CR ——————————— IN RE ELDRIDGE MCKNIGHT, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eldridge McKnight, Jr., pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual

assault of a child. 1 In January 2001, the trial court accepted McKnight’s plea,

deferred adjudication on the charge, and sentenced McKnight to six years’

community supervision. In December 2005, the trial court revoked McKnight’s

community supervision and sentenced him to eight years’ confinement. McKnight

1 The underlying case is State v. McKnight, No. 31,585, in the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas. has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, contending that his conviction and

sentence are void because (1) a person convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a

child is not eligible for community supervision, (2) the statute of limitations

expired before he was indicted, and (3) an associate judge rendered the judgment.

McKnight seeks relief from a final felony conviction. This Court is without

jurisdiction to grant such relief because the exclusive remedy for final felony

convictions is a writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07

(West 2005); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the

Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53

S.W.3d 715, 717−18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). And

only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction

habeas corpus proceedings. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Bd. of

Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483; In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at

717−18. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of

jurisdiction, and we dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Eldridge McKnight, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Eldridge McKnight, Jr. (in Re Eldridge McKnight, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)