In re: Elden Pauline

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 2025
DocketSCPW-25-0000348
StatusPublished

This text of In re: Elden Pauline (In re: Elden Pauline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Elden Pauline, (haw 2025).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAY-2025 07:55 AM Dkt. 7 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

IN RE ELDEN PAULINE ________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1CPN-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the letter filed April 15, 2025,

which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, the motion

filed on May 19, 2025, and the record, an extraordinary writ is

unwarranted because Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and

indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to

seek relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153

Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

It is further ordered that the motion is denied without

prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the circuit court

through counsel, as appropriate. The appellate clerk shall serve Petitioner’s counsel, Daniel Kawamoto, Esq., with a copy

of the petition, motion, and this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 22, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Elden Pauline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elden-pauline-haw-2025.