In re: Elden Pauline
This text of In re: Elden Pauline (In re: Elden Pauline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAY-2025 07:55 AM Dkt. 7 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
IN RE ELDEN PAULINE ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1CPN-XX-XXXXXXX) ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the letter filed April 15, 2025,
which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, the motion
filed on May 19, 2025, and the record, an extraordinary writ is
unwarranted because Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and
indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to
seek relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153
Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
It is further ordered that the motion is denied without
prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the circuit court
through counsel, as appropriate. The appellate clerk shall serve Petitioner’s counsel, Daniel Kawamoto, Esq., with a copy
of the petition, motion, and this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 22, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Elden Pauline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elden-pauline-haw-2025.