in Re Elaine T. Marshall, Individually

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Elaine T. Marshall, Individually

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 14, 2021·No. 14-20-00714-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 14, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00714-CV

IN RE ELAINE T. MARSHALL, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 365,053-403

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 21, 2020, relators Elaine T. Marshall, Individually, et al. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable James Horowitz, presiding judge of Probate Court No 4. of Harris County, to set aside his (1) February 14, 2020 order approving Preston Marshall’s interpleader action; and (2) his June 1, 2020 order denying relators’ motion to modify the February 14, 2020 order.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 14, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00714-CV

IN RE ELAINE T. MARSHALL, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 365,053-403

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 21, 2020, relators Elaine T. Marshall, Individually, et al. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable James Horowitz, presiding judge of Probate Court No 4. of Harris County, to set aside his (1) February 14, 2020 order approving Preston Marshall’s interpleader action; and (2) his June 1, 2020 order denying relators’ motion to modify the February 14, 2020 order.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.

in Re Elaine T. Marshall, Individually, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

in Re Elaine T. Marshall, Individually (in Re Elaine T. Marshall, Individually) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.