In re E.L.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re E.L.

2009 Ohio 1514, 904 N.E.2d 897, 121 Ohio St. 3d 407

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 7, 2009·No. 2008-2299·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *408 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Amanda J. Powell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, E.L.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *408 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Amanda J. Powell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, E.L.

In re E.L., 2009 Ohio 1514, 904 N.E.2d 897, 121 Ohio St. 3d 407 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 1514 (In re E.L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related