In re E.L.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re E.L.

2009 Ohio 1514, 904 N.E.2d 897, 121 Ohio St. 3d 407

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 7, 2009

Docket2008-2299

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 1514 (In re E.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re E.L., 2009 Ohio 1514, 904 N.E.2d 897, 121 Ohio St. 3d 407 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *408 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Amanda J. Powell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, E.L.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *408 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Amanda J. Powell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, E.L.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 1514, 904 N.E.2d 897, 121 Ohio St. 3d 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-el-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack