In Re Eisenhardt
This text of 640 N.W.2d 575 (In Re Eisenhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Christopher Allen EISENHARDT, Minor.
People of the State of Michigan, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Christopher Allen Eisenhardt, Respondent-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 4, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated by the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeals.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., dissents and states as follows.
I would deny leave. While the issue is decidedly close, I would not say the Court of Appeals was clearly erroneous and peremptorily reverse.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., joins in the dissent of MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
640 N.W.2d 575, 465 Mich. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eisenhardt-mich-2002.