In re Eidemiller

105 F. 595, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40
District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided July 14, 1900·No. No. 3,614·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KOI ILSAA.T, District Judge.

This matter comes on to he heard upon demurrer of petitioners to the plea of infancy of the alleged bankrupt. The authorities cited in support of said demurrer do not apply to the law of infancy existing in Illinois. I am of the opinion that in Illinois an infant cannot be adjudged a bankrupt. In this case the infant can, upon reaching majority, repudiate the debts which petitioners claim he owes them. For this reason the petitioners are not creditors, in the sense contemplated by the bankruptcy act, and therefore cannot maintain their petition as such. The demurrer is overruled, with leave to petitioners to reply to the plea within five days, if they choose to controvert the alleged fact of infancy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Eidemiller, 105 F. 595, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40 (N.D. Ill. 1900).

105 F. 595 (In re Eidemiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Murray
199 B.R. 165 (M.D. Tennessee, 1996)