In re Ehlen
334 U.S. 836
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 7, 1948·No. No. 526; No. 527·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Treating the application in each of these cases as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Ehlen, 334 U.S. 836 (1948).
334 U.S. 836 (In re Ehlen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Eisentrager
339 U.S. 763 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Hirota v. MacArthur
335 U.S. 876 (Supreme Court, 1948)