In re Egleston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Egleston

189 A.D.2d 80, 601 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3075

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 189 A.D.2d 80 (In re Egleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Egleston, 189 A.D.2d 80, 601 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12, 1977 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of Ohio where he is presently employed by a corporation, that he has not engaged in the practice of law in New York since his relocation, and that he has no intention of returning to [81]*81practice in this State. There are currently no complaints pending against him.

Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12, 1977 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of Ohio where he is presently employed by a corporation, that he has not engaged in the practice of law in New York since his relocation, and that he has no intention of returning to [81]*81practice in this State. There are currently no complaints pending against him.

Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 80, 601 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-egleston-nyappdiv-1993.