In re Egenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Egenberg

50 A.3d 38, 211 N.J. 604, 2012 WL 3893211, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 842

DecidedSeptember 6, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.3d 38 (In re Egenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Egenberg, 50 A.3d 38, 211 N.J. 604, 2012 WL 3893211, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 842 (N.J. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-418, concluding that HOWARD L. EGENBERG of NORTH ARLINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a) (conflict of interest), RPC 4.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person), and RPC 8.4(e) (conduct-involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

[605]*605It is ORDERED that HOWARD L. EGENBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Buie 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-418, concluding that HOWARD L. EGENBERG of NORTH ARLINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a) (conflict of interest), RPC 4.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person), and RPC 8.4(e) (conduct-involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

[605]*605It is ORDERED that HOWARD L. EGENBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Buie 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.3d 38, 211 N.J. 604, 2012 WL 3893211, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-egenberg-nj-2012.