In re Efros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Efros

255 A.D. 974, 8 N.Y.S.2d 83

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 1938·Published

Opinion

Respondent appeared before Mr. Justice Lee Parsons Davis, directing the investigation of “ ambulance chasing ” in Westchester county, and frankly admitted his shortcomings. Nothing has been presented, which indicates dishonesty or unfair dealing with clients. The court deems he will be sufficiently disciplined by a censure, which is hereby imposed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent appeared before Mr. Justice Lee Parsons Davis, directing the investigation of “ ambulance chasing ” in Westchester county, and frankly admitted his shortcomings. Nothing has been presented, which indicates dishonesty or unfair dealing with clients. The court deems he will be sufficiently disciplined by a censure, which is hereby imposed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

In re Efros, 255 A.D. 974, 8 N.Y.S.2d 83 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 974 (In re Efros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.