In re Efraim O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Efraim O.

186 A.D.2d 571

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.), dated July 22, 1991, which dismissed the petition on the ground that a juvenile cannot be prosecuted for the crime of bail jumping in the second degree.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A juvenile cannot be charged with the crime of bail jumping in the second degree (see, Matter of Natasha C., 181 AD2d 404; Matter of David G., 124 Misc 2d 579). Mangano, P. J., Harwood, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.), dated July 22, 1991, which dismissed the petition on the ground that a juvenile cannot be prosecuted for the crime of bail jumping in the second degree.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A juvenile cannot be charged with the crime of bail jumping in the second degree (see, Matter of Natasha C., 181 AD2d 404; Matter of David G., 124 Misc 2d 579). Mangano, P. J., Harwood, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.

In re Efraim O., 186 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

186 A.D.2d 571 (In re Efraim O.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related