In re Effron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Effron

200 A.D.2d 604, 615 N.Y.S.2d 995

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.D.2d 604 (In re Effron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Effron, 200 A.D.2d 604, 615 N.Y.S.2d 995 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Application by the petitioner Stephen Gary Effron for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. The petitioner was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department on October 18, 1972. By opinion and order of this Court, dated August 1, 1977, the petitioner was disbarred and his name was stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law (58 AD2d 510). By further order of this Court dated May 18, 1992, the petitioner’s application for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for investigation and report.

[605]*605Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it is Ordered that the motion is denied. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Application by the petitioner Stephen Gary Effron for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. The petitioner was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department on October 18, 1972. By opinion and order of this Court, dated August 1, 1977, the petitioner was disbarred and his name was stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law (58 AD2d 510). By further order of this Court dated May 18, 1992, the petitioner’s application for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for investigation and report.

[605]*605Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it is Ordered that the motion is denied. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 604, 615 N.Y.S.2d 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-effron-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack