In Re Ee
This text of 219 S.W.3d 791 (In Re Ee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Interest of E.E., a Minor.
Floyd Ellis and Linda Barton, Respondents/Appellants,
v.
Juvenile Office of the 20th Judicial Circuit, State of Missouri, Petitioner.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
A. David Arand, Union, MO, for appellant.
Heather R. Cunningham, Union, MO, for respondent.
*792 Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Floyd Ellis ("father") and Linda Barton ("mother") appeal the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights. Father and mother (collectively referred to herein as "parents") claim the court erred in terminating their rights because the judgment was not supported by the evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 S.W.3d 791, 2007 WL 1120381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ee-moctapp-2007.