in Re Edwin Martinez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2014
Docket13-14-00640-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Edwin Martinez (in Re Edwin Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Edwin Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00640-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE EDWIN MARTINEZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Edwin Martinez, filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this

Court direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th

District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relator’s verified

plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought against

relator by the real party in interest, Ofelia Trevino, until sixty days after she provides

relator with a notice letter for her claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West,

Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw

through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original

Proceedings). In addition, relator requests that this Court issue immediate temporary

relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.10 (“Temporary Relief”).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL 4243701, at **4–9 (Tex.

App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, the

Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary

relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 31st day of October, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 541.154
Texas IN § 541.154

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Edwin Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edwin-martinez-texapp-2014.