In re Edwards

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Edwards

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 1961·No. D. D. No. 14·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After an examination of the entire proceedings, this court is of the opinion that petitioner does not possess the qualifications which would entitle him to admission to the practice of law.

Accordingly, the petition for reinstatement is denied, and the report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline is disapproved.

Report disapproved and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Radcliff and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliff, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After an examination of the entire proceedings, this court is of the opinion that petitioner does not possess the qualifications which would entitle him to admission to the practice of law.

Accordingly, the petition for reinstatement is denied, and the report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline is disapproved.

Report disapproved and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Radcliff and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliff, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

In re Edwards, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351 (In re Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.