In re Edward S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Edward S.

73 A.D.2d 536, 422 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14283

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.2d 536 (In re Edward S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Edward S., 73 A.D.2d 536, 422 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders, Family Court, New York County, entered on January 4, 1979, adjudicating respondent a juvenile delinquent on the ground that he committed acts, which, if done by an adult, would constitute criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and escape in the third degree, and placing him with the Division for Youth, Title III, for a period of 18 months commencing on November 22, 1978, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to reduce placement to a period of 12 months, and, as so modified, the orders are affirmed, without costs (see. Family Ct Act, § 756, subd [b], as amd, eff Sept. 1, 1978). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Bloom, Markewich, Silverman and Ross,'JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders, Family Court, New York County, entered on January 4, 1979, adjudicating respondent a juvenile delinquent on the ground that he committed acts, which, if done by an adult, would constitute criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and escape in the third degree, and placing him with the Division for Youth, Title III, for a period of 18 months commencing on November 22, 1978, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to reduce placement to a period of 12 months, and, as so modified, the orders are affirmed, without costs (see. Family Ct Act, § 756, subd [b], as amd, eff Sept. 1, 1978). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Bloom, Markewich, Silverman and Ross,'JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 536, 422 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-s-nyappdiv-1979.