in Re Edward S. Hodges, III

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 23, 2015·No. 10-15-00342-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00342-CR

IN RE EDWARD S. HODGES, III

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Petitioner asks for relief in a motion filed on December 16, 2015 for the State’s

failure to timely file its response or motion for extension of time to file its response.

Petitioner’s motion is stricken because it was not served on all parties as required for a

motion or copied on lead counsel for all parties as required for notices to the Court. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 6.3.

Further, we note the State filed a motion for extension of time to file its response

which has been granted to January 21, 2016. Therefore, petitioner’s motion is moot and

we would have no authority to grant it.

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion stricken Order issued and filed December 23, 2015

In re Hodges Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Edward S. Hodges, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re Edward S. Hodges, III (in Re Edward S. Hodges, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.