in Re Edward S. Hodges, III
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00342-CR
IN RE EDWARD S. HODGES, III
Original Proceeding
ORDER
Petitioner asks for relief in a motion filed on December 16, 2015 for the State’s
failure to timely file its response or motion for extension of time to file its response.
Petitioner’s motion is stricken because it was not served on all parties as required for a
motion or copied on lead counsel for all parties as required for notices to the Court. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 6.3.
Further, we note the State filed a motion for extension of time to file its response
which has been granted to January 21, 2016. Therefore, petitioner’s motion is moot and
we would have no authority to grant it.
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion stricken Order issued and filed December 23, 2015
In re Hodges Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Edward S. Hodges, III (in Re Edward S. Hodges, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.