in Re Edward Newsome
This text of in Re Edward Newsome (in Re Edward Newsome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 19, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00439-CR
IN RE EDWARD R. NEWSOME, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 7, 2009, relator, Edward R. Newsome, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In his petition, relator complains that he did not receive credit for time served in jail before his trial for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
Relator seeks post-conviction habeas relief. Although courts of appeals have jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post-conviction felony proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction in this original proceeding.
Accordingly, relator=s petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Brown, and Sullivan.
Do Not PublishCTex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Edward Newsome, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-newsome-texapp-2009.