in Re Edward Kent Hauersperger
This text of in Re Edward Kent Hauersperger (in Re Edward Kent Hauersperger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-428-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE EDWARD KENT HAUERSPERGER
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Wittig
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Edward Kent Hauersperger, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 18, 2004. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 27th day of September, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Edward Kent Hauersperger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-kent-hauersperger-texapp-2004.