in Re: Edward Earl Weddle and Earl M. Weddle
This text of in Re: Edward Earl Weddle and Earl M. Weddle (in Re: Edward Earl Weddle and Earl M. Weddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 26, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00918-CV
IN RE EDWARD EARL WEDDLE AND
EARL M. WEDDLE, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On October 19, 2006, relators Edward Earl Weddle and Earl M. Weddle filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators asked this court to compel the Honorable Tony Lindsay, presiding judge of the 280th Judicial District Court of Harris County, to set aside her October 16, 2006 ruling denying relators= motion for a jury trial.
Relators have informed this court that the underlying case has settled and that they are withdrawing their Petition for Writ of Mandamus. We accordingly dismiss relators= petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 26, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Frost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Edward Earl Weddle and Earl M. Weddle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-earl-weddle-and-earl-m-weddle-texapp-2006.