In re Edward C.L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Edward C.L.

292 A.D.2d 282, 740 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 282 (In re Edward C.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Edward C.L., 292 A.D.2d 282, 740 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2000, which released the subject child to respondent mother upon a finding of neglect by respondent father, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[283]*283The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent father exposed the child to a pervasive environment of verbal abuse directed at respondent mother that sometimes escalated to include unwelcome physical contact, and that the child’s health was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result. The finding of imminent impairment could be made in this case without expert evidence (see, Matter of Lonell J., 242 AD2d 58; Matter of Deandre T., 253 AD2d 497). Concur — Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2000, which released the subject child to respondent mother upon a finding of neglect by respondent father, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[283]*283The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent father exposed the child to a pervasive environment of verbal abuse directed at respondent mother that sometimes escalated to include unwelcome physical contact, and that the child’s health was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result. The finding of imminent impairment could be made in this case without expert evidence (see, Matter of Lonell J., 242 AD2d 58; Matter of Deandre T., 253 AD2d 497). Concur — Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 282, 740 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-cl-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack