In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas

DecidedJune 6, 2024

Docket14-24-00048-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas (In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 6, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00048-CV

IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM P. JOHNSON, WAYNE S. THOMPSON, JR., JUDGE LILYNN CUTRER, AND KAREN AUCOIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEES, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 365-053-404

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Thursday, January 18, 2024, relators Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable James Horowitz, presiding judge of the Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County, to vacate his order denying summary judgment and enter an order granting realtors’ motion for summary judgment.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We lift our May 30, 2024 order staying trial court proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 6, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00048-CV

IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM P. JOHNSON, WAYNE S. THOMPSON, JR., JUDGE LILYNN CUTRER, AND KAREN AUCOIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEES, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 365-053-404

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Thursday, January 18, 2024, relators Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable James Horowitz, presiding judge of the Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County, to vacate his order denying summary judgment and enter an order granting realtors’ motion for summary judgment.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We lift our May 30, 2024 order staying trial court proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, Poissant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-alexander-adam-p-johnson-wayne-s-thompson-jr-judge-texapp-2024.