in Re Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr. Lilynn Cutrer And Karen Aucoin Individually and as Co-Trustees

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr. Lilynn Cutrer And Karen Aucoin Individually and as Co-Trustees

DecidedJune 22, 2018

Docket14-18-00466-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr. Lilynn Cutrer And Karen Aucoin Individually and as Co-Trustees (in Re Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr. Lilynn Cutrer And Karen Aucoin Individually and as Co-Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr. Lilynn Cutrer And Karen Aucoin Individually and as Co-Trustees, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion GRANTED and Order filed June 22, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00466-CV ____________

IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM JOHNSON, WAYNE THOMPSON, JR., LILYNN CUTRER, AND KAREN AUCOIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEES, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 365,053 & 365,053-404

ORDER

June 7, 2018, relators Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr., Lilynn Cutrer; and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relators ask this court to order the Honorable Christine Butts, Judge of the Probate Court No. 4, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside her order dated June 5, 2018, entered in trial court numbers 365,053 & 365,053-404, styled Preston Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, et al. Relators claim respondent abused her discretion by ordering them to produce documents, which they assert are protected by the attorney-client and work product privileges.

Relators also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. Relators ask this court to stay the June 5, 2018 order pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators’ motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER the June 5, 2018 order in trial court cause numbers 365,053 & 365-053-404, Preston Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, et al., STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion GRANTED and Order filed June 22, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00466-CV ____________

IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM JOHNSON, WAYNE THOMPSON, JR., LILYNN CUTRER, AND KAREN AUCOIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEES, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 365,053 & 365,053-404

ORDER

June 7, 2018, relators Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr., Lilynn Cutrer; and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relators ask this court to order the Honorable Christine Butts, Judge of the Probate Court No. 4, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside her order dated June 5, 2018, entered in trial court numbers 365,053 & 365,053-404, styled Preston Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, et al. Relators claim respondent abused her discretion by ordering them to produce documents, which they assert are protected by the attorney-client and work product privileges.

Relators also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. Relators ask this court to stay the June 5, 2018 order pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators’ motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER the June 5, 2018 order in trial court cause numbers 365,053 & 365-053-404, Preston Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, et al., STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Edward Alexander, Adam Johnson, Wayne Thompson, Jr. Lilynn Cutrer And Karen Aucoin Individually and as Co-Trustees, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edward-alexander-adam-johnson-wayne-thompson-jr-lilynn-cutrer-and-texapp-2018.