in Re Eduardo A. Trevino

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 2002
Docket04-01-00778-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Eduardo A. Trevino (in Re Eduardo A. Trevino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Eduardo A. Trevino, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

No. 04-01-00778-CV


IN RE Eduardo A. TREVIÑO
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Arising from the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 1999-CR-4085, 1999-CR-6204 & 1999-CR-6205
Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Alma L. López, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2002

WRIT DENIED

An indigent appellant is entitled to preparation of a free record for purposes of appeal but not for purposes of collateral attack, such as a writ of habeas corpus. See Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex. App.- Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.). This court has determined that the relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Escobar v. State
880 S.W.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Eduardo A. Trevino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eduardo-a-trevino-texapp-2002.