In Re Edna E. Cory

D.C. Circuit

In Re Edna E. Cory

311 F.2d 125, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 76, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3702

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 8, 1962

Docket16874_1

StatusPublished

This text of 311 F.2d 125 (In Re Edna E. Cory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Edna E. Cory, 311 F.2d 125, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 76, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3702 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

*126 PER CURIAM.

The appeal presents the sole question whether the District Court, notwithstanding a procedural defect in the initiation of the steps leading to the decree, was without jurisdiction to enter the decree. Being of opinion that in all the circumstances of the case the defect was an irregularity which did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, its decree is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*126 PER CURIAM.

The appeal presents the sole question whether the District Court, notwithstanding a procedural defect in the initiation of the steps leading to the decree, was without jurisdiction to enter the decree. Being of opinion that in all the circumstances of the case the defect was an irregularity which did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, its decree is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 F.2d 125, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 76, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-edna-e-cory-cadc-1962.