In Re Edna E. Cory

D.C. Circuit

In Re Edna E. Cory

311 F.2d 125, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 76, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3702

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 8, 1962·No. 16874_1·Published

Opinion

*126 PER CURIAM.

The appeal presents the sole question whether the District Court, notwithstanding a procedural defect in the initiation of the steps leading to the decree, was without jurisdiction to enter the decree. Being of opinion that in all the circumstances of the case the defect was an irregularity which did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, its decree is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*126 PER CURIAM.

The appeal presents the sole question whether the District Court, notwithstanding a procedural defect in the initiation of the steps leading to the decree, was without jurisdiction to enter the decree. Being of opinion that in all the circumstances of the case the defect was an irregularity which did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, its decree is

Affirmed.

In Re Edna E. Cory, 311 F.2d 125, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 76, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3702 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

311 F.2d 125 (In Re Edna E. Cory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.