In re Eddins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Eddins

257 A.D. 1070, 14 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9108

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1070 (In re Eddins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Eddins, 257 A.D. 1070, 14 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed and the motion granted to the extent of directing the board of elections to print upon the official primary ballot the names of the candidates for county committeemen in the 1st to the 51st election districts inclusive of the 22nd Assembly district, New York county, appearing in the petitions bearing the names of Thomas K. Eddins, Jr., William A. Cornelius and Mildred E. Eddins as a committee to fill vacancies, upon the ground that the record fails to disclose sufficient basis for the action of the board of elections in rejecting the petitions or to support the order of the court in upholding the board’s action. Present — O’Malley, Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed and the motion granted to the extent of directing the board of elections to print upon the official primary ballot the names of the candidates for county committeemen in the 1st to the 51st election districts inclusive of the 22nd Assembly district, New York county, appearing in the petitions bearing the names of Thomas K. Eddins, Jr., William A. Cornelius and Mildred E. Eddins as a committee to fill vacancies, upon the ground that the record fails to disclose sufficient basis for the action of the board of elections in rejecting the petitions or to support the order of the court in upholding the board’s action. Present — O’Malley, Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1070, 14 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eddins-nyappdiv-1939.