In Re Eddie Hodges Jr v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion issued August 28, 2025.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

We conclude that relator has failed to establish that he is entitled to

mandamus relief, and therefore the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-25-00321-CV ——————————— IN RE EDDIE HODGES JR., Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Eddie Hodges, Jr., filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss real party in interest Crystal Flack’s suit against him.1 Relator requested that the Court vacate the order denying his motion to dismiss and order the trial court to grant the same. 1 The underlying case is Crystal Flack v. Kennard Law, P.C., Alfonso Kennard, Jr., and Eddie Hodges, Jr., Cause No. 2024-88874 in the 281st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Weems presiding.