In Re Eddie Hodges Jr v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Eddie Hodges Jr v. the State of Texas (In Re Eddie Hodges Jr v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 28, 2025.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00321-CV ——————————— IN RE EDDIE HODGES JR., Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Eddie Hodges, Jr., filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging
the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss real party in interest Crystal Flack’s
suit against him.1 Relator requested that the Court vacate the order denying his
motion to dismiss and order the trial court to grant the same.
1 The underlying case is Crystal Flack v. Kennard Law, P.C., Alfonso Kennard, Jr., and Eddie Hodges, Jr., Cause No. 2024-88874 in the 281st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Weems presiding. We conclude that relator has failed to establish that he is entitled to
mandamus relief, and therefore the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Eddie Hodges Jr v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eddie-hodges-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.