In Re Ed Monce v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Ed Monce v. the State of Texas (In Re Ed Monce v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00319-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE ED MONCE
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1
Relator Ed Monce filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial
court to vacate a temporary restraining order and an extension order; however, relator
has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus.
According to the unopposed motion to dismiss, relator has reached an agreement with
real parties in interest Christopher Majka, Tressa Majka, and Esplanade Investments
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). L.L.C. that disposes of the necessity of seeking mandamus relief.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to
dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we lift the stay previously
imposed in this case, we grant the unopposed motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the
petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.
DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the 27th day of June, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Ed Monce v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ed-monce-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.