In re Eckstein

Supreme Court

In re Eckstein

335 U.S. 851

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 25, 1948

DocketNo. 155

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 335 U.S. 851 (In re Eckstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Eckstein, 335 U.S. 851 (1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948).

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that motion for leave to file should be granted and that the case should be set for argument forthwith. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948).

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that motion for leave to file should be granted and that the case should be set for argument forthwith. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

335 U.S. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eckstein-scotus-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack