In re Eckstein
335 U.S. 851
Opinion
Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Eckstein, 335 U.S. 851 (1948).
335 U.S. 851 (In re Eckstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Eisentrager
339 U.S. 763 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Koki Hirota v. General of the Army MacArthur Kenji Dohihara v. General of the Army MacArthur Koichi Kido v. General of the Army MacArthur
335 U.S. 876 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Hirota v. MacArthur
335 U.S. 876 (Supreme Court, 1948)