In re Eckroad

48 App. D.C. 593, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2365
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 1919
DocketNo. 1220
StatusPublished

This text of 48 App. D.C. 593 (In re Eckroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Eckroad, 48 App. D.C. 593, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2365 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Appeal by Oarrell J. Eckroad from a decision of the Patent Office rejecting twenty claims relating to a so-called'shock absorber in an automobile wheel.

Each of the tribunals of the Patent Office has very carefully considered, and, in our view, fully answered the contentions of the applicant. We therefore affirm the decision without further discussion. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 App. D.C. 593, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eckroad-cadc-1919.