In re Ebert

899 A.2d 775, 2006 WL 1418564
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 25, 2006
DocketNo. 06-BG-487
StatusPublished

This text of 899 A.2d 775 (In re Ebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ebert, 899 A.2d 775, 2006 WL 1418564 (D.C. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Allan Ebert, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 25th day of May, 2006,

ORDERED that the said Allan Ebert is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment should run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorney and the effect of failure to comply therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 A.2d 775, 2006 WL 1418564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ebert-dc-2006.