In re Eastmond

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Eastmond

705 A.2d 1204, 152 N.J. 435, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 102

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 13, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 705 A.2d 1204 (In re Eastmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Eastmond, 705 A.2d 1204, 152 N.J. 435, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 102 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on July 16, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JAMES EASTMOND of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES EASTMOND is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter .be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI