in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name
This text of in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name (in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00268-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND EASTMAN IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
Relator Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in its assumed or common
name filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to transfer
venue of the underlying suit from Nueces County, Texas to Galveston County, Texas
based on mandatory venue regarding land. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.
§ 15.011 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).
The Court requests that the real party in interest Gulf Hydrogen and Energy, Inc.,
or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date
of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eastman-chemical-company-and-eastman-in-its-assumed-or-common-name-texapp-2018.