in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00268-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND EASTMAN IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
Relator Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in its assumed or common name filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to transfer venue of the underlying suit from Nueces County, Texas to Galveston County, Texas based on mandatory venue regarding land. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 15.011 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).
The Court requests that the real party in interest Gulf Hydrogen and Energy, Inc., or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response
to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name (in Re Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in Its Assumed or Common Name) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.