In re East Ridge Associates, Ltd.

122 B.R. 809, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 15
CourtDistrict Court, D. Georgia
DecidedJanuary 3, 1991
DocketBankruptcy No. A89-04881
StatusPublished

This text of 122 B.R. 809 (In re East Ridge Associates, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re East Ridge Associates, Ltd., 122 B.R. 809, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 15 (gad 1991).

Opinion

ORDER

W. HOMER DRAKE, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Application of the Life Insurance Company of Georgia (“Life of Georgia”) for Allowance of Attorneys’ Fees (hereinafter referred to as the “Application”), filed on May 18, 1990. The United States Trustee’s office filed comments concerning the Application on June 6, to which Life of Georgia responded on June 12.1 Objections to the Application were filed by East Ridge Associates (“Debtor”) on June 8 and by Resolution Trust Corporation, the conservator for Great Southern Federal Savings and Loan Association (“Great Southern”), on June 11. A hearing was held on the matter on August 30. This is a core proceeding over which this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) (1990). The following constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

' FINDINGS OF FACT

On May 5, 1972, Charles H. Raines, Mildred Anne Raines, W.T. Goodloe Rutland, and Ann M. Rutland (the “Owners”), owners of a parcel of real property in Jefferson County, Alabama (“Parcel One”), signed a promissory note for the benefit of Central Bank and Trust Company in the principal amount of $1,500,000, and they granted a security interest in the property to the bank pursuant to an accompanying mortgage.2 On June 1, 1973, the Owners executed another mortgage on Parcel One to secure a promissory note to Central Bank of Birmingham for $1,130,000. The two mortgages (the “Central Mortgages”) were consolidated and later assigned to Life of Georgia, and on July 1, 1974 the Owners transferred Parcel One to Rutland and Raines Partnership.

On or around November 30, 1983, Rut-land and Raines Partnership transferred Parcel One to First Equities Corporation (“First Equities”), a corporation that acquires property for and syndicates limited [811]*811partnerships. On that day First Equities borrowed $1,600,000 from Life of Georgia for the purpose of buying another parcel of real property (“Parcel Two”) to be cross-collateralized with Parcel One, and in return First Equities offered a promissory note and mortgage to Life of Georgia (the “Life of Georgia Note” and “Life of Georgia Mortgage”). Pursuant to a Modification of Note and Mortgage (the “Modification Agreement”) entered on the same day, Life of Georgia authorized First Equities to transfer both parcels within sixty days and to borrow up to $2,000,000 from a secondary source. First Equities borrowed that amount from Great Southern in return for a wraparound promissory note in the principal amount of $5,901,813.09 (the “Great Southern Note”), which encompassed the outstanding balances on the underlying notes held by Life of Georgia, and an accompanying mortgage (the “Great Southern Mortgage”). Finally, First Equity conveyed the parcels, along with a Warranty Deed, to Debtor subject to the above-described mortgages. The signature of Donald Nichols appears on the Modification Agreement, the Life of Georgia Note and Mortgage, the Great Southern Note and Mortgage, and the Warranty Deed as vice president of First Equity. However, Mr. Nichols also signed the Great Southern Mortgage in his capacity as general partner of First Equities Associates-N, which is the general partner of Debtor.

The end result of this series of transactions was the development of the East Ridge Apartments complex on the two parcels. Debtor later defaulted on its mortgage obligations, however, and on May 8, 1989, it filed a Chapter 11 petition. Life of Georgia now seeks attorneys’ fees under certain provisions of the mortgages which encumber the property.3

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

According to § 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code,

[t]o the extent that an allowed secured claim is secured by property the value of which ... is greater than the amount of such claim, there shall be allowed to the holder of such claim ... any reasonable fees, costs, or charges provided for under the agreement under which such claim arose.

11 U.S.C. § 506(b) (1990). Attorneys’ fees can only be recovered under this provision if they are provided for in a contractual agreement, In re D.W.G.K. Restaurants, Inc., 84 B.R. 684 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1988). In this case Life of Georgia’s claim arose from provisions in the Central Mortgages and the Life of Georgia Mortgage. Debtor was not named as a party to these mortgages, however, and Debtor and Great Southern argue that as a result Debtor is not obligated to pay the fees to Life of Georgia. For support, they cite Judge Murphy’s decision in In re Club Associates, 107 B.R. 794 [812]*812(Bankr.N.D.Ga.1989). In that case, a debt- or purchased an apartment complex from a realty investor which was subject to two prior mortgages and executed a wraparound note, the principal balance of which incorporated the balance of the prior mortgages; the prior mortgages provided for collection of reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with default, Id. at 795. Noting that “[t]he requirement in § 506(b) that the agreement provide for collection of attorneys fees evidences an intent of Congress that the creditor must show the parties agreed to the payment of attorneys fees,” Id. at 796, Judge Murphy ruled that the mortgagees were not entitled to fees under the agreements because the debtor was not a party to the agreements with the prior mortgagees and therefore never assumed the attorneys’ fees obligation, Id. at 797.

. The purpose of the privity requirement, implies Judge Murphy in Club Associates, is to prevent an unwitting stranger to an agreement from being stuck with an obligation for which he or she did not bargain. Debtor was no stranger to the Life of Georgia Mortgage, however. First, Debtor is closely linked to First Equities (who executed the Mortgage) through Donald Nichols, who is both the vice president of First Equities and the general partner of First Equities Associates-N, Debtor’s general partner. In fact, Mr. Nichols signed the Mortgage. Second, Debtor was intimately involved in the series of same-day transactions that included the Mortgage.4 First Equities syndicated Debtor for the purpose of acquiring real property for the development of the East Ridge Apartments, and both the Life of Georgia Mortgage and Debtor’s purchase of the parcels from First Equities were integral parts of this larger scheme.

The Court must look beyond the face of a contract to the surrounding facts when identifying the true parties to the contract, Tri-Cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Pressmen and Assistants Local 349, 427 F.2d 325, 327 (5th Cir.1970). Having done so, the Court concludes that Debt- or was a nominal party to the Life of Georgia Mortgage and was therefore obligated by paragraphs 8 and 9 of that mortgage to pay Life of Georgia’s attorneys’ fees. Moreover, the Court agrees with Life of Georgia that a party should not be able to avoid its attorneys’ fees obligation under a mortgage provision simply by transferring the encumbered property to a closely related entity. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Life of Georgia’s Application is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re D.W.G.K. Restaurants, Inc.
84 B.R. 684 (S.D. California, 1988)
In Re Club Associates
107 B.R. 794 (N.D. Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 B.R. 809, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-east-ridge-associates-ltd-gad-1991.