in Re: Earl Silas Bingley

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 19, 2003
Docket01-03-00590-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Earl Silas Bingley (in Re: Earl Silas Bingley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Earl Silas Bingley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Opinion issued June 19, 2003





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-03-00590-CV



IN RE EARL SILAS BINGLEY, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the Fourteenth Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed his 25-year sentence for aggravated sexual assault. See Bingley v. State, No. C14-85-488-CR, slip op. at 3-4 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, no pet.). This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Higley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Earl Silas Bingley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-earl-silas-bingley-texapp-2003.