in Re: Earl Silas Bingley
This text of in Re: Earl Silas Bingley (in Re: Earl Silas Bingley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 19, 2003
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-03-00590-CV
IN RE EARL SILAS BINGLEY, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the Fourteenth Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed his 25-year sentence for aggravated sexual assault. See Bingley v. State, No. C14-85-488-CR, slip op. at 3-4 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, no pet.). This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003).
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Higley.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Earl Silas Bingley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-earl-silas-bingley-texapp-2003.