In re Eagen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Eagen

830 A.2d 952

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 29, 2003

DocketNo. 837 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 830 A.2d 952 (In re Eagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Eagen, 830 A.2d 952 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 19, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Francis Peter Eagen, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Francis Peter Eagen, III, is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 19, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Francis Peter Eagen, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Francis Peter Eagen, III, is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

830 A.2d 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eagen-pa-2003.