in Re: E. E. Hood & Sons, Inc.
This text of in Re: E. E. Hood & Sons, Inc. (in Re: E. E. Hood & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
|
IN RE: E.E. HOOD & SONS, INC., Relator. |
' |
No. 08-12-00094-CV AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS |
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 13, 2012, Relator filed its Motion for Review of Trial Court’s Rule 24.2(d) Order or Alternatively, Petition for Writ of Mandamus. We originally determined that Relator’s filing should be addressed as a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and filed it as such. Upon further evaluation of the arguments, authority, and evidence presented by the parties, we now determine that the matters raised by Relator’s filing are properly presented for our consideration as a Motion for Review under Rule 24.4(a). Tex.R.App.P. 24.2(d), 24.4. We therefore dismiss Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus and re-file Relator’s filing as a Motion for Review pursuant to Rule 24(a) in a pending appeal, David Nelson, Individually and d/b/a Collective Contracting, A Sole Proprietorship, Collective Contracting, Inc., and E.E. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Vernco Construction, Inc. (Cause No. 08-10-00222-CV). Tex.R.App.P. 24.4.
April 4, 2012 ________________________________________________
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.
Rivera, J., not participating
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: E. E. Hood & Sons, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-e-e-hood-sons-inc-texapp-2012.