In re E. Bement's Sons

Michigan Supreme Court

In re E. Bement's Sons

114 N.W. 329, 150 Mich. 536, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 842

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 30, 1907

DocketDocket No. 14

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 N.W. 329 (In re E. Bement's Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re E. Bement's Sons, 114 N.W. 329, 150 Mich. 536, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 842 (Mich. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Ostrander, J.

We agree with counsel for the receiver that the exceptions 8th and 9th, to the commissioner’s report, relied upon in this court, are to some extent argumentative and in that respect are objectionable. The 9th exception is, however, sufficiently specific to present the theory relied upon by appellant and its application to the case. The supplemental report of the commissioner apparently determines the right of appellant to interest in accordance with the rule stated in the matter of the Appeal of State Bank of Michigan in the same proceeding. [537]*537All other questions presented are considered in the case referred to and are answered in favor of the appellant. An order may be entered in conformity with the opinion in that case. Appellant will recover costs of the appeal.

Carpenter, Grant, Blair, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ostrander, J.

We agree with counsel for the receiver that the exceptions 8th and 9th, to the commissioner’s report, relied upon in this court, are to some extent argumentative and in that respect are objectionable. The 9th exception is, however, sufficiently specific to present the theory relied upon by appellant and its application to the case. The supplemental report of the commissioner apparently determines the right of appellant to interest in accordance with the rule stated in the matter of the Appeal of State Bank of Michigan in the same proceeding. [537]*537All other questions presented are considered in the case referred to and are answered in favor of the appellant. An order may be entered in conformity with the opinion in that case. Appellant will recover costs of the appeal.

Carpenter, Grant, Blair, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 N.W. 329, 150 Mich. 536, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-e-bements-sons-mich-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack