In re Dyshea T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dyshea T.

17 A.D.3d 685, 792 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4397

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 17 A.D.3d 685 (In re Dyshea T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dyshea T., 17 A.D.3d 685, 792 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b and Family Court Act article 6 to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated December 23, 2003, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that she permanently neglected the children, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Christina B., 8 AD3d 373 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b and Family Court Act article 6 to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated December 23, 2003, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that she permanently neglected the children, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Christina B., 8 AD3d 373 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.3d 685, 792 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dyshea-t-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack