In Re Dylan Scott Krufal v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00034-CV
IN RE DYLAN SCOTT KRUFAL, Relator Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 19, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME DENIED AS MOOT
On January 15, 2025, relator Dylan Scott Krugal filed a petition for writ of mandamus.
Real-party-in-interest, the State of Texas, filed a response on February 6, 2025. After considering the petition, the response, and all exhibits attached thereto, this court concludes relator has not shown himself to be entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 2 PER CURIAM
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2024CVK000427D1, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Lopez presiding. 2 We deny as moot real-party-in-interest S.H.’s February 10, 2025 motion for an extension of time to file a response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Dylan Scott Krufal v. the State of Texas (In Re Dylan Scott Krufal v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.