In re Dyer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Dyer

91 So. 3d 289, 2012 WL 2504903, 2012 La. LEXIS 1940

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 27, 2012

DocketNo. 2012-B-1412

StatusPublished

This text of 91 So. 3d 289 (In re Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dyer, 91 So. 3d 289, 2012 WL 2504903, 2012 La. LEXIS 1940 (La. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

*

| ,The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with his client, and failed to properly withdraw from the representation of the client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Byrne W. Dyer, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5135, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI