In re Dyer
This text of 2014 Ark. 197 (In re Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. 197
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-14-344
Opinion Delivered May 1, 2014 IN RE DUSTIN DANIEL DYER, ARKANSAS BAR NO. 2003-082 PETITION TO SURRENDER ARKANSAS LAW LICENSE
PETITION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
On recommendation of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, we
hereby accept the voluntary surrender, in lieu of probable disbarment proceedings, of the
license of Dustin Daniel Dyer of Benton, Saline County, Arkansas, to practice law in the State
of Arkansas. In his petition to voluntarily surrender his license to practice, filed with this
court on April 18, 2014, Mr. Dyer acknowledges that the rules violations he is alleged to have
committed likely would be proved at trial and would constitute serious misconduct as defined
in section 17.B of the Arkansas Supreme Court Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct.
Mr. Dyer also states that he wishes to avoid the expense, stress, and publicity of disbarment
proceedings. The name of Dustin Daniel Dyer shall be removed from the registry of licensed
attorneys, and he is barred and enjoined from engaging in the practice of law in the State of
Arkansas.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dyer-ark-2014.