in Re Dustin Estep
This text of in Re Dustin Estep (in Re Dustin Estep) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00006-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE DUSTIN ESTEP
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva Order Per Curiam
On January 6, 2023, relator Dustin Estep filed a petition for writ of mandamus
contending that the trial court abused its discretion by issuing temporary orders in the
underlying suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Relator subsequently filed an
emergency motion for immediate temporary relief.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for
immediate temporary relief, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we
grant the emergency motion for immediate temporary relief, and we order the January 4, 2023 temporary orders to be stayed pending the resolution of this original proceeding.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10. We request the real parties in interest, Briana Nicole Lewis,
Carl Raymond Lewis, and Maria Dolores Lewis, or any others whose interest would be
directly affected by the relief sought, such as Aida A. Montanaro, the amicus attorney for
minor child A.F.L., or the Office of the Attorney General, to file a response to the petition
for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order.
See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 10th day of January, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Dustin Estep, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dustin-estep-texapp-2023.