In re Dur'an
155 So. 3d 1256, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1286, 2015 WL 403973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 2015·No. No. 1D14-5083·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Angel A. Dur’an petitions this court for mandamus relief to compel the circuit court to rule on his petition for name change. However, he fails to show that he has called his petition up for a hearing, as is contemplated by Section 68.07, Florida Statutes (2014). He has therefore failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Moore v. Correctional Medical Services, 817 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Dur'an, 155 So. 3d 1256, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1286, 2015 WL 403973 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
155 So. 3d 1256 (In re Dur'an) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kahane v. Patterson
202 So. 3d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)