in Re: Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. and Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. D/B/A Hannibal Cable Operations

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 2009
Docket13-09-00291-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. and Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. D/B/A Hannibal Cable Operations (in Re: Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. and Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. D/B/A Hannibal Cable Operations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. and Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. D/B/A Hannibal Cable Operations, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-09-00291-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG



IN RE: DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND

DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A

HANNIBAL CABLE OPERATIONS



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus,

Emergency Motion for Immediate Temporary Relief, and

Motion for Instruction to Trial Court.



MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



Relators, Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. and Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. d/b/a Hannibal Cable Operations, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, an emergency motion for immediate temporary relief, and a "motion for instruction to trial court to reduce its ruling to a signed and dated order," in the above cause on June 1, 2009. On June 2, 2009, the real parties in interest filed a response to relators' emergency motion for temporary relief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the accompanying motions, and the real parties' response to the motion for immediate temporary relief, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the aforementioned motions are DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 2nd day of June, 2009.



1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. and Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. D/B/A Hannibal Cable Operations, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dura-automotive-systems-inc-and-dura-automot-texapp-2009.