In re Dupree

727 S.E.2d 739, 398 S.C. 111, 2012 WL 2408720, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 94
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 18, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

By order dated April 13, 2012, the request to place petitioner on interim suspension and to appoint an attorney to protect clients’ interests was denied. After further consideration by [112] the Court, the order of April 13, 2012, is rescinded, and the respondent is hereby placed on interim suspension. An attorney to protect clients’ interests will be appointed by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J. /s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J. /s/KAYE G. HEARN, J. PLEICONES, J., not participating.

I would not rescind the order of April 13, 2012.

/s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dupree, 727 S.E.2d 739, 398 S.C. 111, 2012 WL 2408720, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 94 (S.C. 2012).

727 S.E.2d 739 (In re Dupree) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re DuPree
737 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)