In re Dunnuck

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Dunnuck

647 N.E.2d 631, 1995 Ind. LEXIS 24, 1995 WL 104693

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1995

DocketNo. 18S00-9306-DI-596

StatusPublished

This text of 647 N.E.2d 631 (In re Dunnuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dunnuck, 647 N.E.2d 631, 1995 Ind. LEXIS 24, 1995 WL 104693 (Ind. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER LIFTING SUSPENSION

The respondent herein, Donald H. Dun-nuck, was suspended on June 15, 1993, from the practice of law pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 283, Section 10(e), based upon his conviction in the Delaware Cireuit Court. Thereafter, the respondent appealed the conviction, and, on December 28, 1994, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Case No. 18A02-98310-CR-559, 644 N.E.2d 1275, reversing the convictions on grounds of insufficient evidence. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 15(B), the judgment of the Court of Appeals was not final until such time as neither a petition for rehearing nor transfer had been timely filed, or, if either was filed, until each had been resolved without effecting the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Having denied today the State's petition to transfer in Case No. CR-559, this Court now finds that the suspension from the practice of law based on the reversed conviction should be lifted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT the suspension of Donald H. Dunnuck from the practice of law is hereby lifted and that he is reinstated as a member of the Bar of this State.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward copies of this order to all parties who were notified of the respondent's suspension pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(8)(d).

/s/ Randall T. Shepard Randall T. Shepard Chief Justice of Indiana

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER LIFTING SUSPENSION

The respondent herein, Donald H. Dun-nuck, was suspended on June 15, 1993, from the practice of law pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 283, Section 10(e), based upon his conviction in the Delaware Cireuit Court. Thereafter, the respondent appealed the conviction, and, on December 28, 1994, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Case No. 18A02-98310-CR-559, 644 N.E.2d 1275, reversing the convictions on grounds of insufficient evidence. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 15(B), the judgment of the Court of Appeals was not final until such time as neither a petition for rehearing nor transfer had been timely filed, or, if either was filed, until each had been resolved without effecting the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Having denied today the State's petition to transfer in Case No. CR-559, this Court now finds that the suspension from the practice of law based on the reversed conviction should be lifted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT the suspension of Donald H. Dunnuck from the practice of law is hereby lifted and that he is reinstated as a member of the Bar of this State.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward copies of this order to all parties who were notified of the respondent's suspension pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(8)(d).

/s/ Randall T. Shepard Randall T. Shepard Chief Justice of Indiana

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

647 N.E.2d 631, 1995 Ind. LEXIS 24, 1995 WL 104693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dunnuck-ind-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack