In re Dunn
This text of 954 So. 2d 767 (In re Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations of professional misconduct by respondent, including violations of Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct stemming from her criminal convictions for attempted insurance fraud, filing a false police report, and shoplifting. After formal charges were filed, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. The parties stipulate to respon[768]*768dent’s misconduct, and seek her permanent disbarment from the practice of law.
Based on our review of the petition, we agree that permanent disbarment is the appropriate sanction under Guideline 6 (insurance fraud) of the permanent disbarment guidelines set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Appendix E. Accordingly, having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted. The name of Kerri F. Dunn, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26269, shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and her license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24(A), it is further ordered that respondent be permanently prohibited from being readmitted to the practice of law in this state.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
954 So. 2d 767, 2007 WL 1229089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dunn-la-2007.