In Re Dumas

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Re Dumas

600 S.E.2d 61, 360 S.C. 33, 2002 S.C. LEXIS 241

DecidedDecember 6, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 600 S.E.2d 61 (In Re Dumas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Dumas, 600 S.E.2d 61, 360 S.C. 33, 2002 S.C. LEXIS 241 (S.C. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

By Opinion dated July 20, 1992, petitioner was disbarred from the practice of law in South Carolina. In the Matter of Dumas, 309 S.C. 5, 419 S.E.2d 791 (1992). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommended that the petition be denied. We disagree with the recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

s/James E. Moore, J.

s/John H. Waller, Jr., J.

s/E.C. Burnett, III, J.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI