Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri/In re Duke

In re Duke

15 F.2d 92, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1370
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri·Decided March 12, 1924·No. No. 3922·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

FARIS, District Judge.

The petition for review herein is denied, and the order of the referee confirmed, for the reasons given by the referee, which reasons are adopted as the opinion of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Duke, 15 F.2d 92, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1370 (circtedmo 1924).

15 F.2d 92 (In re Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PermaLife Products, LLC v. TSJ Dirt, LLC (In Re PermaLife Products, LLC)
432 B.R. 503 (D. New Jersey, 2010)
West v. Hsu (In Re Advanced Modular Power Systems, Inc.)
413 B.R. 643 (S.D. Texas, 2009)
In re Blue Coal Corp.
206 B.R. 730 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
In Re Bodin Apparel, Inc.
46 B.R. 555 (S.D. New York, 1985)
In the Matter of Orbit Liquor Store and Orbit Beer and Wine Package Store. Mrs. Pitsa Soteres, Mr. James P. Soteres, Mr. William T. Crain v. Frank W. Scroggins, as Receiver, Trustee, and Attorney for Trustee in Bankruptcy, A. Mims Wilkinson, Jr., as Attorney for Bankrupt, No. 30756. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
439 F.2d 1351 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Orbit Liquor Store v. Scroggins
439 F.2d 1351 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Soteres v. Scroggins
439 F.2d 1351 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin
191 F.2d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
In re United States Products Corp.
57 F. Supp. 239 (N.D. California, 1944)
In re Nixon
23 F. Supp. 310 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1938)