In re Duke

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

In re Duke

15 F.2d 92, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1370

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

DecidedMarch 12, 1924

DocketNo. 3922

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 15 F.2d 92 (In re Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Duke, 15 F.2d 92, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1370 (circtedmo 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

FARIS, District Judge.

The petition for review herein is denied, and the order of the referee confirmed, for the reasons given by the referee, which reasons are adopted as the opinion of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Orbit Liquor Store and Orbit Beer and Wine Package Store. Mrs. Pitsa Soteres, Mr. James P. Soteres, Mr. William T. Crain v. Frank W. Scroggins, as Receiver, Trustee, and Attorney for Trustee in Bankruptcy, A. Mims Wilkinson, Jr., as Attorney for Bankrupt, No. 30756. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

439 F.2d 1351 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Orbit Liquor Store v. Scroggins

439 F.2d 1351 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Soteres v. Scroggins

439 F.2d 1351 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin

191 F.2d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)

In re United States Products Corp.

57 F. Supp. 239 (N.D. California, 1944)

In re Nixon

23 F. Supp. 310 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F.2d 92, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-duke-circtedmo-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack